Review Form

1. Title of Proposed Event
--------------------------------------------------------------------


2. How important is this topic to the robotics community?
-------------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite important
[] not so much
[] unimportant

Please provide a statement regarding relevance:


3. How interesting will this workshop be to RSS participants?
-------------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite interesting
[] not so much
[] uninteresting

Please provide a statement regarding interest:


4. What is the status of the workshop website?
----------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor

Please provide a statement regarding the submitted URL:


5. Is the suggested duration of the workshop appropriate?
---------------------------------------------------------

[] Yes
[] No, too long
[] No, too short

6. Is there a sufficient number of speakers/participants involved? Are
they relevant to the scope of the project?
----------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor

Please provide a statement regarding the submitted list of speakers:


7. Do the organizers have a good plan for soliciting participation?
-----------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor

Please provide a statement regarding the plan for soliciting
participation:


8. Have the organizers made an effort to encourage discussion and
interactions during their proposed event?
-----------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor

Please provide a statement regarding the expected interactivity of the
proposed event:

9. Have the organized outlined how they might encourage speakers to focus on the topic and tailor their talks to the workshop?
-----------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor

Please explain:


10. If outlier track: how well does the proposal push the boundaries of traditional academic workshops by examining ideas that are (i) important for the field; (ii) hard done by the formal peer-review process?
-----------------------------------------------------------

[] excellent
[] quite good
[] not so good
[] poor
[] not outlier track

Please provide a statement regarding how well the proposal pushes the boundaries of traditional academic workshops:


11. Main Strength/Weakness of Workshop Proposal
----------------------------------------------

+:
 
-:


Please provide feedback to the organizers on how they could improve
their event and its impact:


12. Overall Recommendation
--------------------------

[] Strong accept
[] Weak accept
[] Weak reject
[] Strong reject